ABC News Coverage of the 2016 Election: A Retrospective

Introduction

The 2016 presidential election was one of the most closely watched and controversial in recent history. ABC News provided extensive coverage of the election, from the early primaries through the general election and beyond. This blog post will take a retrospective look at ABC News' coverage of the 2016 election, examining its strengths and weaknesses.

Strengths of ABC News' Coverage

ABC News' coverage of the 2016 election was praised for its accuracy, fairness, and depth. The network's reporters provided in-depth analysis of the candidates and the issues, and they were not afraid to challenge both candidates when necessary.

ABC News also provided a variety of perspectives on the election. The network's coverage included interviews with voters from all walks of life, as well as experts from a variety of fields. This gave viewers a well-rounded understanding of the election and the issues at stake.

Weaknesses of ABC News' Coverage

While ABC News' coverage of the 2016 election was generally praised, there were some areas where the network could have improved. One criticism was that ABC News focused too much on the horse race aspect of the election. The network's coverage often focused on the polls and the candidates' chances of winning, rather than on the issues at stake.

Another criticism was that ABC News was too negative in its coverage of the election. The network's reporters often focused on the candidates' flaws and missteps, rather than on their strengths. This gave viewers a negative impression of the election and the candidates.

Conclusion

ABC News' coverage of the 2016 election was a mixed bag. The network's coverage was praised for its accuracy, fairness, and depth. However, the network was also criticized for focusing too much on the horse race aspect of the election and for being too negative in its coverage.

Despite these criticisms, ABC News' coverage of the 2016 election was generally well-received. The network's reporters provided in-depth analysis of the candidates and the issues, and they were not afraid to challenge both candidates when necessary.